This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] New MIPS interrupt handler patch


"Fu, Chao-Ying" <fu@mips.com> writes:

> +#ifdef FINAL_POSTSCAN_INSN
> +     FINAL_POSTSCAN_INSN (insn, ops, insn_noperands);
> +#endif

I know we have FINAL_PRESCAN_INSN, but I sort of hate to see us
introduce another target macro.  We are supposedly trying to move toward
function pointers in the target structure (target.h, target-def.h).  How
about doing that instead?

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]