This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] New MIPS interrupt handler patch
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: "Fu\, Chao-Ying" <fu at mips dot com>
- Cc: "Richard Sandiford" <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <anemet at caviumnetworks dot com>, <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at linux-mips dot org>, "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow at false dot org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:02:41 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] New MIPS interrupt handler patch
- References: <94BD67F8AF3ED34FA362C662BA1F12C502BB5BF5@MTVEXCHANGE.mips.com> <94BD67F8AF3ED34FA362C662BA1F12C502BB5C10@MTVEXCHANGE.mips.com> <8763hf2aff.fsf@firetop.home> <000801c9b8a5$d5d4af90$9414a8c0@mips.com>
"Fu, Chao-Ying" <fu@mips.com> writes:
> +#ifdef FINAL_POSTSCAN_INSN
> + FINAL_POSTSCAN_INSN (insn, ops, insn_noperands);
> +#endif
I know we have FINAL_PRESCAN_INSN, but I sort of hate to see us
introduce another target macro. We are supposedly trying to move toward
function pointers in the target structure (target.h, target-def.h). How
about doing that instead?
Ian