This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix -Wdisallowed-function-list=* (PR c++/39554)
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> I don't think this option,
> which was introduced because of a real need, should be discarded because
> there is a different way to do something else.
What do you think about the design issue, though? Independent of the
need for the feature, I think we should come up with a way of doing this
that allows for overloading. Unless we have a story about how adding
that will be compatible with what we have (rather than introducing a
separate mechanism), I think we should defer this functionality.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713