This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix for PR/39548

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:55:38 +0100
Subject: Re: Fix for PR/39548
References: <522e93240903241102rd2c0a1cn4bab064e3a26bb3@mail.gmail.com> <522e93240903242157y5e34cfa6hae7fb6c7899cf7e4@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:57:13PM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> This is the new version of the change -- the check is moved out of the
> loop. I did not add the assertion in set_copy_of_val as this ended up
> with lots of failures in regression test. May need investitagion
> separately (real problem or interface design issue).
> 
> compiler bootstrapped on linux/i686. Regression test is redone.

The testcase size is way over the usual testcase sizes.
Either distill a smaller testcase from it (use delta, or manually trim it
down), or don't include it at all.

	Jakub

References:
- Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Xinliang David Li
- Re: Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Xinliang David Li

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]