This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Bingfeng Mei <bmei at broadcom dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:48:01 +0100
Subject: Re: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
References: <7FB04A5C213E9943A72EE127DB74F0AD49F021D37D@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <200903191513.24726.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <49C25651.5060107@gmail.com> <84fc9c000903190722m105dacb7gfb9317d4117e026e@mail.gmail.com> <7FB04A5C213E9943A72EE127DB74F0AD49F021D3B5@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <20090319152408.GA13147@hungry-tiger.westford.ibm.com> <7FB04A5C213E9943A72EE127DB74F0AD49F021D3BB@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <20090319153653.GH4831@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <7FB04A5C213E9943A72EE127DB74F0AD49F021D3DF@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <de8d50360903191011g6afe5f03wb1ffae1fafaca65d@mail.gmail.com> <7FB04A5C213E9943A72EE127DB74F0AD49F021D411@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com>

>> Is your target a LLP64L32?  I think it should mention pointers there
> 
> No.  We have long long (64-bit)  long (32-bit), pointer (32-bit). I checked
> this description before, but didn't figure out that my target has to use 
> 64-bit HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT ( a bit lazy to do all cleanup really :-)

BITS_PER_WORD?  That's the one that counts.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
  - From: Bingfeng Mei

References:
- Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
  - From: Bingfeng Mei
- Re: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
  - From: Richard Guenther
- RE: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
  - From: Bingfeng Mei
- Re: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
  - From: Michael Meissner
- RE: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
  - From: Bingfeng Mei
- Re: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- RE: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
  - From: Bingfeng Mei
- Re: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- RE: Suspected bug lshift_value (expmed.c) and its patch
  - From: Bingfeng Mei

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]