This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] SMS - Pass the actual schedulable rows to compute_split_row
- From: Ayal Zaks <ZAKS at il dot ibm dot com>
- To: Revital1 Eres <ERES at il dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: "Adrian Ashley" <aashley at broadcom dot com>, "Bingfeng Mei" <bmei at broadcom dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:56:45 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] SMS - Pass the actual schedulable rows to compute_split_row
Revital1 Eres/Haifa/IBM wrote on 13/03/2009 07:50:08:
> Hello,
>
> > > Using testsuite/gcc.dg/sms-6.c as an example and compiling it for
> > PowerPC,
> > > node 18 (see attachment) is in a SCC and cannot be scheduled until
> > spliting
> > > twice. The MII = 20 and the schedule can only be found at II = 24.
> >
> > Yes, I see. This example raises a couple of issues:
> >
> > o The first row split (from II=20 to II=21) is miscalculated; it should
be
> > row 20=0 instead of 19. Splitting row 19 cannot help schedule node 18,
and
> > indeed we immediately split another row. We're now checking a small
patch
> > to fix this, which should save one cycle of II in the above example.
>
> Here is the patch, on behalf of Ayal.
> Passed bootstrap + regtest with SMS flags on ppc64 and bootstrap +
> regtest x86.
>
> I'll commit it later today to trunk if that's OK.
>
OK for trunk, when it's reopened for general patches (it's currently in
stage 4, allowing only regression fixes; this is a missed-optimization fix,
as splitting a row outside the window should not cause any problems except
for inefficiency). Please add a short comment for this short fix,
documenting the fact that the scheduling window is exclusive of 'end'
whereas compute_split_window() expects an inclusive, ordered range.
Bingfeng, you're welcome to try it out.
Thanks, Ayal.
> Thanks,
> Revital
>
> * modulo-sched.c (sms_schedule_by_order): Pass the actual
> schedulable rows to compute_split_row.
>
> [attachment "patch_sms_12_3.txt" deleted by Ayal Zaks/Haifa/IBM]