This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote: > "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote: >>> I committed this patch to the gcc-in-cxx branch. This fixes the >>> top-level configury to not think the c++ is missing because it was >>> explicitly enabled. It also comments out some code which added >>> -fkeep-inlin-functions to stage 1. When building with C++ this breaks >>> the inline functions which are provided by <gmp.h>, as they wind up >>> getting included in many .o files leading to duplicate definition >>> errors at link time. >>> >> >> I also noticed that keeping inline function led to link time error. >> Can't we mark the kept inline function linktonce? > > I have no objection to that. It would make -fkeep-inline-functions > more useful for g++. > Here is a patch. -- H.J. --- gcc/ 2009-01-30 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> * c-decl.c (start_function): Call make_decl_one_only if an inline function is accessible from outside. gcc/testsuite/ 2009-01-30 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> * gcc.dg/inline-33.c: New. * gcc.dg/inline-33a.c: Likewise.
Attachment:
gcc-inline-1.patch
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |