This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix canonicalization of addresses
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:34:32 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix canonicalization of addresses
- References: <200812231211.50787.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <200812292202.57337.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <84fc9c000812291351w53a489bah875c219f1486f74e@mail.gmail.com> <200901061517.32961.ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I was asking, with -O2 (where we do the same folds), what does "fix" it
>> without your patch? Thus, why is the regression only there for -Os?
>
> Andrew, do you have the answer to this one?
I don't, no. I do know that this problem is manifested with -Os
on several targets, so I don't think it's target-specific.
Andrew.