This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [LTO] Fix C++ thunks

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Rafael Espindola" <espindola at google dot com>
Cc: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Jason Merrill" <jason at redhat dot com>, "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:11:41 -0500
Subject: Re: [LTO] Fix C++ thunks
References: <20081217173334.GA9561@google.com> <84fc9c000812290831l6561e532v7d4b970def1d4384@mail.gmail.com> <38a0d8450812290903k5fd98436gfc10aa2cc5203da7@mail.gmail.com> <de8d50360812291010r52110961n4a15ffb65f73302f@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also the suggestion of __builtin_va_arg_pack, that only works with
> inline functions and is not able to expand to something correct IIRC.

    case BUILT_IN_VA_ARG_PACK:
      /* All valid uses of __builtin_va_arg_pack () are removed during
         inlining.  */
      error ("%Kinvalid use of %<__builtin_va_arg_pack ()%>", exp);
      return const0_rtx;

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [LTO] Fix C++ thunks
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- [LTO] Fix C++ thunks
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [LTO] Fix C++ thunks
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [LTO] Fix C++ thunks
  - From: Rafael Espindola
- Re: [LTO] Fix C++ thunks
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]