This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Don't link ecj1 against libgcj.so.* (PR libgcj/38396)

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:57:02 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't link ecj1 against libgcj.so.* (PR libgcj/38396)
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.patches
References: <20081218093733.GW17496@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <494A248A.2060203@redhat.com>

> No.  It's in conflict with the patch that I already wrote and posted
> to the list, and I'm about to commit.

In your patch you need to change -Wl,-L$(here)/.libs,-lgcj to
-Wl,-L$(here)/.libs,-L$(here)/_libs,-lgcj to support OSes where the
libtool internal directory is _libs (BTW maybe
-Wl,-L.libs,-L_libs,-Wl,-lgcj works too?).

(/me notes to self to try understanding what is Libtool doing under your
feet).

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Don't link ecj1 against libgcj.so.* (PR libgcj/38396)
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [PATCH] Don't link ecj1 against libgcj.so.* (PR libgcj/38396)
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues

References:
- [PATCH] Don't link ecj1 against libgcj.so.* (PR libgcj/38396)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Don't link ecj1 against libgcj.so.* (PR libgcj/38396)
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]