This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Resync toplevel files
- From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Stan Shebs <stan at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:06:23 +0100
- Subject: Re: Resync toplevel files
- References: <1494040D-E0DB-41C2-99F6-1F14F70CCB41@adacore.com> <492EB60B.firstname.lastname@example.org> <6A1603A9-3E73-4D15-8A6A-1205F327722C@adacore.com> <Pine.LNX.email@example.com>
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> On Nov 27, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Stan Shebs wrote:
>>> Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>> all the bits for darwin/x86 have been committed but the top-level
>>>> configure doesn't build gdb.
>>>> This patch build gdb when configured for i*86-*-darwin.
>>> This is good, thanks!
>> Committed. Thanks.
> Remember that toplevel patches need to go in both the gcc and src
> repositories. As there seem to be quite a lot that haven't, I've applied
> this patch to GCC and will follow up with resyncing changes in the other
I was about to write an email about this... The main culprit is
actually the PPL/CLOOG configury that was not committed to src.