This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran] RFC: PR fortran/37779, diagnose "missing" recursive


> ... I converted the warnings back to errors as suggested by Paul and Tobias ...

I am reluctant to throw errors on valid codes how dubious they can be:
call bar(foo) inside foo is valid as long foo is not called inside bar even
if it is probably useless. As suggested by Daniel on IRC, I would prefer a warning.
If some people want an error, they can use -Werror.

Dominique

PS the patch works as expected without regression on intel/darwin9.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]