This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [LTO]How should be resolve a DECL with no function body?


2008/11/14 Doug Kwan (éæå) <dougkwan@google.com>:
> Just removing the decls without body is enough for this bug but I am
> not sure if that is the right thing to do.  We will end up with binfos
> with incomplete vtables.  If we late do need that binfo (like in the
> folder as Diego mentions), we will run into troubles.

Do you know why we are using binfo in the ME? If it is hard to remove
the DECLs, just make sure we are not computing resolutions for them.
If I remember correctly we already do that with abstract decls.

> -Doug
>


Cheers,
-- 
Rafael Avila de Espindola

Google | Gordon House | Barrow Street | Dublin 4 | Ireland
Registered in Dublin, Ireland | Registration Number: 368047


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]