This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [LTO]How should be resolve a DECL with no function body?
Just removing the decls without body is enough for this bug but I am
not sure if that is the right thing to do. We will end up with binfos
with incomplete vtables. If we late do need that binfo (like in the
folder as Diego mentions), we will run into troubles.
2008/11/14 Rafael Espindola <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Just removing the decls without body from it should be enough for this bug, no?