This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [LTO]How should be resolve a DECL with no function body?


On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 08:04, Rafael Espindola <espindola@google.com> wrote:

> Just removing the decls without body from it should be enough for this bug, no?

Yes, that's likely.  IIRC, at the time that we run
pass_ipa_free_lang_specifics, functions don't yet have gimple_body()
set, but they should have DECL_SAVED_TREE set.  Doug, that's something
worth exploring.


Diego.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]