This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: R10000 Needs LL/SC Workaround in Gcc


On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 08:33:03PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

> > There are two ways we could handle this:
> > 
> >   - Make -mfix-r10000 require -mbranch-likely.  (It mustn't _imply_
> >     -mbranch-likely.  It should simply check that -mbranch-likely is
> >     already in effect.)
> > 
> >   - Make -mfix-r10000 insert nops when -mbranch-likely is not in effect.
> 
>  If I recall right, these is something special about the pipeline in this 
> context making the branch-likely instructions the only ones that work.  
> Which would make the option you proposed first the only viable.  I am not 
> absolutely sure and I have no reference handy.  Perhaps Ralf or someone at 
> linux-mips will know?

There are two possible workarounds.  The other which IRIX and the Linux
kernel are using is based on the branch-likely instruction.  The way it
works is that R10000 family processors have a fairly cheesy branch
prediction for branch likely (unlike all MIPS32 and MIPS64 processors I
know of!) which predicts branch likely instructions as always taken.  So
if a SC instruction succeeds the loop closure branch of the usual LL/SC
loop will be miss-predicted and the pipeline restarted.

The alternative is to put enough NOPs (upto 28) after the loop closure
brach to avoid a sequence of 4 problematic instructions being active in
the pipeline at the same time.

SSNOP won't cut it btw.  SSNOP don't have any influence on the predecode
and reordering buffers - even assuming the R10000 actually honors SSNOP.
Implementing the special treatment of SSNOP (which is encoded as
SLL $0, $0, 1) just doesn't make sense for an R10000 calibre processor.

Is gcc capable of guaranteeing a certain minimum number of instructions
between one LL and another LL instruction?  Then this knowledge could be
used to avoid the branch likely or cut down the padding NOPs.

  Ralf


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]