This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix unaligned load on the IA-64

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:36:25 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix unaligned load on the IA-64
References: <200810311225.59610.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <84fc9c000810310446y5e4e40fav9baf52ce441a4371@mail.gmail.com>

> I wonder if after the args[i].mode == BLKmode check we always have a MEM_P?
> Or, if not, if we only ever need the unaligned handling for MEM_Ps?

Yes, I pondered that a little too, but the parameter passing code is very 
intricate so I think we should err on the side of caution.  I think testing 
MEM_P before accessing MEM_ALIGN must be kept in any cases, but we could try 
to rely exclusively on MEM_ALIGN and not test TYPE_ALIGN at all.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

References:
- [PATCH] Fix unaligned load on the IA-64
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix unaligned load on the IA-64
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]