This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Fwd: r141178 - in /branches/graphite/gcc: ChangeLog....


Hi,

Below is the commit message from a patch that went in the graphite
branch.  This patch includes documentation for -fgraphite-identity.  I
think that we should avoid documenting debugging options, i.e. all the
-fgraphite* flags, that should not be used by programmers.

Other than this documentation problem, I do not see other reasons to
not include the -fgraphite-identity patch in trunk.

Sebastian

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:  <grosser@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Subject: r141178 - in /branches/graphite/gcc: ChangeLog....
To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org


Author: grosser
Date: Thu Oct 16 17:44:40 2008
New Revision: 141178

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141178
Log:
2008-10-16  Tobias Grosser  <grosser@fim.uni-passau.de>

       * doc/invoke.texi: Add -fgraphite-identity.
       * graphite.c (graphite_apply_transformations): Check for
       -fgraphite-identity.
       * toplev.c (process_options): Add flag_graphite_identity.
       * tree-ssa-loop.c: Add flag_graphite_identity.
and those below, will be ignored--

M    gcc/doc/invoke.texi
M    gcc/toplev.c
M    gcc/tree-ssa-loop.c
M    gcc/graphite.c
M    gcc/common.opt
M    gcc/ChangeLog.graphite

Modified:
   branches/graphite/gcc/ChangeLog.graphite
   branches/graphite/gcc/common.opt
   branches/graphite/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
   branches/graphite/gcc/graphite.c
   branches/graphite/gcc/toplev.c
   branches/graphite/gcc/tree-ssa-loop.c


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]