This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Fwd: r141178 - in /branches/graphite/gcc: ChangeLog....
- From: "Sebastian Pop" <sebpop at gmail dot com>
- To: "GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Richard Guenther" <rguenther at suse dot de>, "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:08:46 -0500
- Subject: Fwd: r141178 - in /branches/graphite/gcc: ChangeLog....
- References: <20081016174440.18167.qmail@sourceware.org>
Hi,
Below is the commit message from a patch that went in the graphite
branch. This patch includes documentation for -fgraphite-identity. I
think that we should avoid documenting debugging options, i.e. all the
-fgraphite* flags, that should not be used by programmers.
Other than this documentation problem, I do not see other reasons to
not include the -fgraphite-identity patch in trunk.
Sebastian
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <grosser@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Subject: r141178 - in /branches/graphite/gcc: ChangeLog....
To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org
Author: grosser
Date: Thu Oct 16 17:44:40 2008
New Revision: 141178
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141178
Log:
2008-10-16 Tobias Grosser <grosser@fim.uni-passau.de>
* doc/invoke.texi: Add -fgraphite-identity.
* graphite.c (graphite_apply_transformations): Check for
-fgraphite-identity.
* toplev.c (process_options): Add flag_graphite_identity.
* tree-ssa-loop.c: Add flag_graphite_identity.
and those below, will be ignored--
M gcc/doc/invoke.texi
M gcc/toplev.c
M gcc/tree-ssa-loop.c
M gcc/graphite.c
M gcc/common.opt
M gcc/ChangeLog.graphite
Modified:
branches/graphite/gcc/ChangeLog.graphite
branches/graphite/gcc/common.opt
branches/graphite/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
branches/graphite/gcc/graphite.c
branches/graphite/gcc/toplev.c
branches/graphite/gcc/tree-ssa-loop.c