Re: [Patch, Fortran] Check arguments of elemental intrinsic subroutines for conformance

[Daniel Kraft <d at domob dot eu>]

Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> > Is it ok if no regressions occur?  What do you think, should I commit now
> > and work then on the "real" part of PR 35681 or should I try to do both in a
> > single larger patch?  I'm fine with both options, although I don't expect
> > that there's a significant "dependance" of both problems, so seperate
> > patches seem totally fine.
>
> I think that this is good to be committed now.  It is close on obvious
> and must be done, regardless of the fix for PR35681.
>
> OK for trunk, subject to regtest.

No regressions (here on GNU/Linux-x86-32, thanks Dominique for your 
testing, too!), committed to trunk as rev. 141175.  Thanks for the quick 
review!

> PS As a matter of curiosity, how will you fix PR35681?  It clearly
> needs a temporary, so how will you trigger it?

I have to admit that I've not yet looked into it really deeply; I think 
I will first start some playing around and try to find out where the 
need for a temporary is missed...  Well, simply I don't know yet :)  But 
hopefully I'll find a way ;)

Yours,
Daniel

--
Done:  Arc-Bar-Cav-Rog-Sam-Val-Wiz
To go: Hea-Kni-Mon-Pri-Ran-Tou