This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch for PR 37418

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:57:35 +0200
Subject: Re: Patch for PR 37418
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809141402550.14123@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <48CD24B0.6070204@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809141654440.14123@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

> This is a matter of internal representation, not how people write their 
> programs.  Both ways of expressing a noreturn function in the source code 
> - with an attribute or with a qualifier - end up getting represented the 
> same way in the internal representation.

So I guess this bug applies also to other attributes like "pure" (this
was not clear from your message).

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patch for PR 37418
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- Patch for PR 37418
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Patch for PR 37418
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: Patch for PR 37418
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]