This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch]: Fix bootstrap/PR 25502: I64d format Werror problem in build

From: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
To: "Aaron W. LaFramboise" <aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com>
Cc: "Danny Smith" <dansmister at gmail dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "Kai Tietz" <Kai dot Tietz at onevision dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Kai Tietz" <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:41:22 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch]: Fix bootstrap/PR 25502: I64d format Werror problem in build
References: <OF43D10E25.6939B2FD-ONC12574BE.00433E09-C12574BE.00442404@onevision.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809081518460.30115@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <48C5B261.7040907@aaronwl.com> <9c03c2dd0809082132h2e70ae68kc1386cf5ce9bc539@mail.gmail.com> <48CA8B76.3000606@aaronwl.com>

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Aaron W. LaFramboise
<aaronavay62@aaronwl.com> wrote:
> Do you think this is sufficiently risky that it should be delayed to 4.5?
>  Or would you prefer it be rolled into -fms-extensions?

More specifically, why is it considered at risk at all?

References:
- Re: [patch]: Fix bootstrap/PR 25502: I64d format Werror problem in build
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: [patch]: Fix bootstrap/PR 25502: I64d format Werror problem in build
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [patch]: Fix bootstrap/PR 25502: I64d format Werror problem in build
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise
- Re: [patch]: Fix bootstrap/PR 25502: I64d format Werror problem in build
  - From: Danny Smith
- Re: [patch]: Fix bootstrap/PR 25502: I64d format Werror problem in build
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]