This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Update libtool to latest git tip
- From: "Peter O'Gorman" <pogma at thewrittenword dot com>
- To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:25:44 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update libtool to latest git tip
- References: <4899CE7F.1080301@pogma.com> <20080806161928.GA686@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <4899D0A7.8040307@pogma.com> <20080806184347.GC2521@ins.uni-bonn.de> <489A9BD2.2070800@gnu.org> <489B2A7C.3020209@pogma.com> <20080811194722.GF8049@ins.uni-bonn.de> <48A09ABD.8050903@pogma.com> <20080821034808.GD26343@localhost.localdomain> <48AD7BC6.3080201@gnu.org>
Hi Paolo,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 04:29:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:02:05PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>>> Yes, I tried it also -
>>> http://pogma.com/misc/gcc-libtool-git20080810.patch (Slight change to
>>> ltgcc.m4, otherwise git libtool + generated files).
>>>
>>> I plan on testing more widely next weekend and proposing a patch the
>>> following week, regardless of whether libtool-2.2.6 is released. (Unless
>>> Ralph would prefer to do it?)
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> Does not look much like there will be a libtool 2.2.6 release this month.
>
> Why? Regressions, or just no time?
Well, libtool-2.2.6 is finally released (twice even).
>
> Actual approval depends on your answer to this question, but the patch is
> technically okay. Can you commit it to the src repository too? There is
> some regeneration to do there too.
I know that GCC is now in stage 3, and that we missed the end of stage 1
by a week, but I would still like to update gcc's libtool to 2.2.6.
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
pogma@thewrittenword.com