This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFA: small IRA fixes
Jonathan Lennox wrote:
Vladimir Makarov writes:
+purposes. If a move between two registers in the same cover class are
+possible, it should be cheaper than a load or store of the registers.
Grammar nit: this should be "If a move between two registers in the same
cover class is possible, ..." -- the subject of the clause is "a move", so
the verb needs to be singular.
Thanks, I fixed it.
2008-09-05 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
* doc/tm.texi (IRA_COVER_CLASSES): Fix a typo.
Index: doc/tm.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/tm.texi (revision 140052)
+++ doc/tm.texi (working copy)
@@ -2830,7 +2830,7 @@
The macro defines cover classes for the Integrated Register Allocator
(@acronym{IRA}). Cover classes are a set of non-intersecting register
classes covering all hard registers used for register allocation
-purposes. If a move between two registers in the same cover class are
+purposes. If a move between two registers in the same cover class is
possible, it should be cheaper than a load or store of the registers.
The macro value should be the initializer for an array of register
class values, with @code{LIM_REG_CLASSES} used as the end marker.