Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/35837: Fix type-resolving and gfc_current_ns

[Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>]

Hi Daniel,

Daniel Kraft wrote:
> Currently regression testing on GNU/Linux-x86-32, and
> I hope there won't be any despite this might have some
> consequences; but I hope all are positive :)
> Ok to commit if no regressions?

OK. (Let's see whether a user finds out that it causs a regression ;-)

> PS: The gfc_save_all change remained from some experiments there;
> I can take it out if you prefer. Should I add a ChangeLog entry
> like "removed blank line"?

Leave it in, but I think the rules say that one should add a
ChangeLog item.

Thanks for this patch and thanks for looking into the F95 bugs!
(Currently, we have 23 "Fortran95 bugs" and 4 regressions w/o patch)

Tobias

PS: I wonder why the number of new bug reports is quite low. Is there
no intensive testing anymore? Or is it indeed that difficult to hit
bugs in gfortran? (Well, every day programs clearly work.) I think
in a few weeks we should pre-announce GCC 4.4 in c.l.f and call for
testing it (in general plus new features). By then GCC should have
stabilized and we have still enough time to address newly found bugs.
-- Hopefully, Stage3 will be shorter than last time (5 months).