"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> wrote:
If using DF seems like the Right Thing, we could simply apply both
patches, which would give a similar same allocno order to the one
we have now. But it seemed better to look a bit deeper first...
Richard, please apply the both patches. As I wrote above there is no
SPECFP regression anymore with the patches. They also solves some
testsuite regressions concerning EH.
Hi Richard,
Could you please apply your use DF patch? It fixes EH regressions
as well as 434.zeusmp in SPEC CPU 2006?
As I said yesterday, I'm reluctant to apply the first patch,
because without further analysis, there's a danger it's just
papering over a deeper problem.
It's interesting that it fixes EH regressions for you too though.
That was what the patch was originally meant to do, but I thought
I'd only seem the regressions I was fixing on MIPS, not on x86_64.
Which target did you see them on?