This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [testsuite] don't use IBM 128-bit long double for IEEE tests

From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:48:45 -0700
Subject: Re: [testsuite] don't use IBM 128-bit long double for IEEE tests
References: <1219700106.6416.2.camel@janis-laptop> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0808271946140.23732@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Reply-to: janis187 at us dot ibm dot com

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 19:51 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Which specific assertions do you find are unportable to IBM long double as 
> opposed to indicating compiler bugs?  Your analysis in PR 36332 says the 
> built-in functions are misclassifying __LDBL_MAX__, which would clearly be 
> a compiler bug, not a testcase bug.

Mea culpa.  I got sloppy and didn't look into it far enough this time,
and obvious forgot I had looked into this failure once before.

Janis

References:
- [testsuite] don't use IBM 128-bit long double for IEEE tests
  - From: Janis Johnson
- Re: [testsuite] don't use IBM 128-bit long double for IEEE tests
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]