This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: sje at cup dot hp dot com
Cc: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:37:03 -0700
Subject: Re: PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c
References: <6dc9ffc80808060840m3cd0337bx4533b7d0f179d0fa@mail.gmail.com> <1218841014.744023.20838.nullmailer@hpsje.cup.hp.com>

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 3:56 PM,  <sje@cup.hp.com> wrote:
> When I get to the gcc_assert I find that dest_mode is CQImode (size 2)
> and tmp_mode is DImode (size 8) and the assert fails.

I also get the same failure on spu-elf:
/home/apinski/src/local/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat//struct-by-value-11_x.c:9:
internal compiler error: in emit_group_store, at expr.c:2084^M

And I hear from JSM28, SPARC64 has the same ICE too.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c
  - From: H.J. Lu
- PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c
  - From: sje

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]