This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, v3] Bringing <mutex> and <condition_variable> up to spec.

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: iant at google dot com, Chris Fairles <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, mark at codesourcery dot com
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:24:58 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v3] Bringing <mutex> and <condition_variable> up to spec.
Accept-language: en-US
References: <fac6bb500807221520m945f12es2b37e058d25f85ec@mail.gmail.com> <20080723112007.35eb06c4@balbo.artheist.org> <fac6bb500807281512y178ebab8x98b4aa6f3f72f2c8@mail.gmail.com> <20080729102127.451bbe85@balbo.artheist.org> <fac6bb500807301355r550d8152n5627e02443cc05d2@mail.gmail.com> <12565519.1217454411476.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt304.oracle.com> <9471531.1217455437012.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt304.oracle.com> <20080731111604.6dcd953f@balbo.artheist.org>

Hi,

I think we are absolutely on the same page here. And I'm explicitly adding Mark in CC.

Only:

> The libstdc++ bits look ok to me: thanks for moving the ball
> forward on this Chris.

Sure, many thanks again. My only concern: can you please double check the dg-do run lines on top of the testcases and make sure that we are not trying to run tests requiring new gthr.h facilities on targets which use anything but posix threads?

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Bringing <mutex> and <condition_variable> up to spec.
  - From: Chris Fairles

References:
- [PATCH, v3] Bringing <mutex> and <condition_variable> up to spec.
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Bringing <mutex> and <condition_variable> up to spec.
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Bringing <mutex> and <condition_variable> up to spec.
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Bringing <mutex> and <condition_variable> up to spec.
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Bringing <mutex> and <condition_variable> up to spec.
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Bringing <mutex> and <condition_variable> up to spec.
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Bringing <mutex> and <condition_variable> up to spec.
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Bringing <mutex> and <condition_variable> up to spec.
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]