This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: trunk: PATCH: passes with name starting with dot have no dump file.
Hello All
Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
Dave Korn wrote:
Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote on 31 July 2008 12:14:
Good point. Should I submit a new trivial patch, or is nobody interested
in having some way to avoid dump on some passes?
I'm sure there'll be a non-algorithmic maintainer along in a moment
or two
...
My motivation is still to be able to have every pass being uniquely
named.
I think it's an excellent idea :) and frankly your patch is as close as
it's possible to be to trivial-and-obvious without actually being trivial
and obvious - i.e. only because it actually introduces new behaviour.
So here is the updated patch to trunk rev138388
gcc/Changelog:
My ChangeLog was incorrect (dot word should be star). The diff is still
the same, in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg02424.html so
I avoid repeating it here.
The better gcc/ChangeLog is
2008-07-31 Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch>
* tree-pass.h: Added comment about not dumping passes with name
starting with star in struct opt_pass.
* passes.c (register_dump_files_1): Don't do dump for a pass with
name starting with star.
* doc/passes.texi (Pass manager): mention pass names and special
meaning of star prefix to avoid dump.
And the patch did bootstrap ok on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
..../configure-d with '--disable-multilib' '--enable-languages=c,c++'
Ok for trunk?
NB: I don't know if I have to keep the same subject (to keep the same
mailing list thread) or if I can change the subject (here I would like
to put start instead of dot in the subject). In other words, what is
mattering most, the subject line or the In-Reply-To: mail field?
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***