This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][ARM] optimizing _muldi3 for Thumb


2008/7/27 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>:
> Doug Kwan (Ãö®¶¼w) wrote:

> And I think Nathan Froyd's question is a good one; if there's an
> efficient instruction sequence for this, let's not use libgcc at all,
> unless we're optimizing for size.  When optimizing for speed, we should
> avoid the call entirely.

Okay. I will try generating instruction sequence directly.  However,
we may still want to optimize libgcc because the current generated
code is horrible.

-Doug

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]