This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> We agree on everything else, including the opinion that run-time >> failures are bad. > > Ok, great. > > Paolo, I tried applying your patch for basic testing without the library bits, but compilation breaks like this: > > ../../trunk/gcc/config/linux.h:82:1: warning: "BASE_LIB_SPEC" redefined > ../../trunk/gcc/config/linux.h:71:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > ../../trunk/gcc/config/linux.h:87:2: error: #else after #else > ../../trunk/gcc/config/linux.h:76:1: error: the conditional began here > ../../trunk/gcc/config/linux.h:76:1: error: unterminated #else > > Could you possibly tweak it and rediff? > > Thanks, > Paolo. > > I modified Paolo's original patch as attached, not sure if its 100% correct. Chris
Attachment:
librt_asneeded_patch.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |