This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
Hi,
> We agree on everything else, including the opinion that run-time
> failures are bad.
Ok, great.
Paolo, I tried applying your patch for basic testing without the library bits, but compilation breaks like this:
../../trunk/gcc/config/linux.h:82:1: warning: "BASE_LIB_SPEC" redefined
../../trunk/gcc/config/linux.h:71:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
../../trunk/gcc/config/linux.h:87:2: error: #else after #else
../../trunk/gcc/config/linux.h:76:1: error: the conditional began here
../../trunk/gcc/config/linux.h:76:1: error: unterminated #else
Could you possibly tweak it and rediff?
Thanks,
Paolo.
- References:
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.