Re: [PATCH]: XFAIL failing FRE tests and status of other regresions

["Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>]

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
> By popular demand, i am xfailing these until after tuples merge, since
> Richard says he won't be able to look at them until then.
>
> I looked at the extra vectorization failures caused by the PRE patch
> (no-scevccp-outer-13 and no-scevccp-outer-7), and PRE doesn't touch
> either testcase these days.
> I haven't looked to see what PRE used to do, but if these are supposed
> to be being vectorized without PRE's help, they aren't being.
>
> I have looked at the C++ failures around trie_data_map_rand, and i
> can't see PRE doing anything wrong to it right now.  It is also hard
> to test because i can't find a random seed that consistently breaks
> it, and there is no way to set the random seed without editing the
> testcase support files.
> It is also hard to analyze because valgrind goes nuts on it with
> errors. Ben said he would look at this. Once he has looked into it, i
> will take another look myself.
>
> So i'm currently working on the java Array_3 failure, and then the
> darwin fortran I/O failures.
>
> Sorry for the occasional breakage, it's been a tricky line to walk to
> figure out what should wait until tuples merges (some of these
> failures disappear there apparently)

I just have fixed some there already...

> and what should be looked at now
> (and i've been soliciting the advice of other maintainers along the
> way).
>
> --Dan
>
> 2008-07-20  Daniel Berlin  <dberlin@dberlin.org>
>
>        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-7.c: XFAIL.
>        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-8.c: Ditto.
>        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-9.c: Ditto.
>        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-13.c: Ditto.
>        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-14.c: Ditto.
>        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-17.c: Ditto.
>        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-pre-15.c: Ditto.
>        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre1.c: PASS.

Thanks,
Richard.