This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][LTO] cgraph node set.

From: "=?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=" <dougkwan at google dot com>
To: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>, "Doug Kwan (?????w)" <dougkwan at google dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Jan Hubicka" <jh at suse dot cz>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:10:28 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH][LTO] cgraph node set.
References: <498552560807141704j5922dca9k87c94a38924393f1@mail.gmail.com> <b798aad50807141714y30f89da6ve8edf2477dcfc6d3@mail.gmail.com> <20080715092546.GA32066@virgil.suse.cz>

Hi Martin

2008/7/15 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>:

> As of revision 137620 ipa-cp  (and hopefully ipa-inline will soon too)
> uses  a vector  indexed by  cgraph_node->uid and  also one  indexed by
> cgraph_edge->uid.   The decision  was made  by Honza.   I  believe the
> strategy  is  to  hope  this  is  viable and  look  for  more  complex
> alternatives only if we find out it is not.

Can you clarify a little bit more? Do you mean using a global vector
that maps node to set? Or do you mean using one vector for one set?

-Doug

References:
- [PATCH][LTO] cgraph node set.
  - From: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=
- Re: [PATCH][LTO] cgraph node set.
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [PATCH][LTO] cgraph node set.
  - From: Martin Jambor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]