This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Tuplifying tree-vect-pattern.c

From: "=?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=" <dougkwan at google dot com>
To: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:48:35 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Tuplifying tree-vect-pattern.c
References: <498552560807030058q11a44045sbeabca93fdbe3a5e@mail.gmail.com> <b798aad50807031337n33faf3e2i67f86e9592324391@mail.gmail.com>

Hi

2008/7/3 Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>:

> Since DOT_PROD_EXPR is not likely to be very common, the easiest
> approach here is to treat DOT_PROD_EXPR as a GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS in
> get_gimple_rhs_class and just set the operand to 'build3
> (DO_PROD_EXPR...)'

We have a number of ternary expressions.  Are we going to treat them
all like that?

-Doug

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Tuplifying tree-vect-pattern.c
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [PATCH][TUPLES] Tuplifying tree-vect-pattern.c
  - From: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=
- Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Tuplifying tree-vect-pattern.c
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]