This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [trunk][patch] gimplify type sizes in a pointer type

From: Olivier Hainque <hainque at adacore dot com>
To: Rafael Espindola <espindola at google dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, hainque at adacore dot com
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:58:42 +0200
Subject: Re: [trunk][patch] gimplify type sizes in a pointer type
References: <38a0d8450806120030t19cfd10bi5296ced2e26bc126@mail.gmail.com> <b798aad50806120437hf80805sdb2754f1e62d02d6@mail.gmail.com> <20080612125407.GA3974@cardhu.act-europe.fr> <38a0d8450806120651n23616c2fpbe40c18a2a12f16e@mail.gmail.com> <20080612152342.GA12204@cardhu.act-europe.fr>

Hi Rafael,

Olivier Hainque wrote:
>  It sounds like you would need for C++ something similar to what
>  we ended up doing for C

 Another track: another fix we had considered was to gimplify sizes
 the way you did, only restricted to types without decls. This was
 discussed in the thread and we eventually went the front-end way.

 Out of curiosity, would this solve the problem you're having 
 (condition your recursion to TYPE_DECL less target types) ?

 Olivier

References:
- [trunk][patch] gimplify type sizes in a pointer type
  - From: Rafael Espindola
- Re: [trunk][patch] gimplify type sizes in a pointer type
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [trunk][patch] gimplify type sizes in a pointer type
  - From: Olivier Hainque
- Re: [trunk][patch] gimplify type sizes in a pointer type
  - From: Rafael Espindola
- Re: [trunk][patch] gimplify type sizes in a pointer type
  - From: Olivier Hainque

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]