This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [ira] better allocation for -O0

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Kaz Kojima" <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
Cc: vmakarov at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 15:32:37 -0700
Subject: Re: [ira] better allocation for -O0
References: <481F7CAA.1040405@redhat.com> <20080506.072838.147419016.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> <de8d50360805051530t5a97661bs7791eabfc5264367@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
>  > Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> wrote:
>  >  > The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86_64 and tortured on
>  >  > x86/x86_64.
>  >
>  >  BTW, builds for SH and ARM on ira branch fail with
>  >
>  >  ~/ira/gcc/ira-color.c:2794: undefined reference to `ALLOCNO_NO_STACK_REG_P'
>
>
>  Looking at your patch, it looks like no_stack_reg_p can be just
>  removed as it is only set and not actually used.


Sorry I am wrong, I should have looked into the full source before commenting.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- [ira] better allocation for -O0
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: [ira] better allocation for -O0
  - From: Kaz Kojima
- Re: [ira] better allocation for -O0
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]