This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch Fix2 PR35013, PR27192

From: Andy H <hutchinsonandy at aim dot com>
To: "Weddington, Eric" <eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, aesok at post dot ru
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:29:31 -0400
Subject: Re: Patch Fix2 PR35013, PR27192
References: <8CA6FB7826680C3-13CC-1B40@webmail-dd20.sysops.aol.com> <258DDD1F44B6ED4AAFD4370847CF58D50144462A@csomb01.corp.atmel.com>

Ok. I retested patch.

Bootstrapped and regression tested with 4.4.0 20080419 using gcc-torture/execute tests and avrtest simulator

=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            11977
# of unexpected failures        65
# of unresolved testcases       39
# of unsupported tests          703
/cygdrive/e/awhconf/gcc/xgcc  version 4.4.0 20080419 (experimental) (GCC)

The above failure are already known - or are compilation "failures" caused by "new" binutils warnings of:

Warning: expression dangerous with linker stubs

which will occur with good code. (Eric please fix! - or tell me you have fixed this already)

Apart from that annoyance, its all good.

Andy

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Patch Fix2 PR35013, PR27192
  - From: Weddington, Eric

References:
- Patch Fix2 PR35013, PR27192
  - From: hutchinsonandy
- RE: Patch Fix2 PR35013, PR27192
  - From: Weddington, Eric

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]