This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Revision 3: utf-16 and utf-32 support in C and C++
- From: "Doug Gregor" <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>
- To: "Kris Van Hees" <kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com>
- Cc: "Jason Merrill" <jason at redhat dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:53:07 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revision 3: utf-16 and utf-32 support in C and C++
- References: <20080415200017.GA3887@oracle.com>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com> wrote:
> Oracle has a full copyright assignment in place with the FSF.
>
> Please refer to the following message in the archives for the original
> posting of this patch:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00827.html
>
> and the previous revisions in:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg01474.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg02025.html
>
> This 3rd revised patch addresses more feedback provided on this list. This
> patch is not incremental - it replaces the previous posting. The changelog
> entries mentioned in this message also replace the original entries. The
> description that follows describes the changes to the previous patch.
Which of the C++0x Unicode proposals does this cover? I'd like to
update GCC's C++0x language support status pages at
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/cxx0x_status.html
The C++0x Unicode proposals are:
- New character types N2249
- Raw and Unicode string literals N2442
- Universal character name literals N2170
- Doug