This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: f951 segfaults for gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90

From: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
To: jvdelisle at verizon dot net
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:59:57 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Re: f951 segfaults for gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
References: <20080415.092734.35267317.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> <4804240F.9000506@verizon.net>

Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@verizon.net> wrote:
> This bug has been reported previously:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35864

I've missed it.  Sorry for not noticing it.

> The patch you are doing here is probably a good idea.  However, it may be 
> masking the real problem, so we need to check into it further.  PaulT is working 
>   on this.
> 
> A preliminary patch is here:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-04/msg00107.html
> 
> Can you test this?

It seems that the above patch is already applied on the trunk.
I've tested the newer trunk including it (revision 134304) but
got a similar segfault under gdb.

Regards,
	kaz

References:
- f951 segfaults for gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
  - From: Kaz Kojima
- Re: f951 segfaults for gfortran.dg/initialization_1.f90
  - From: Jerry DeLisle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]