This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Two simple bug fixes.

From: "=?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=" <dougkwan at google dot com>
To: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:36:31 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Two simple bug fixes.
References: <498552560804130035i1eaf5f2k63dce4a338c3e4a5@mail.gmail.com> <38a0d8450804130050q12c7eb4ex4a28c579f969505d@mail.gmail.com> <498552560804130101v2df40bc4u80330bc50f7033d0@mail.gmail.com> <498552560804130159n5809a663n6d2b826312ac3def@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000804130204k4403cae0j4c117c2a934de5fd@mail.gmail.com> <b798aad50804140449w3e21fc69y4b17ca6d2c8ab440@mail.gmail.com> <498552560804141029r3979380g7210c4f1cd6c1508@mail.gmail.com>

So are you guys okay with this fix ? If so, which version of the patch
should be checked in? The original one or the one with the assert?
The tree-ssa-sink patch depends on this bug fix.

-Doug

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Two simple bug fixes.
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [PATCH][TUPLES] Two simple bug fixes.
  - From: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=
- Fwd: [PATCH][TUPLES] Two simple bug fixes.
  - From: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=
- Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Two simple bug fixes.
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Two simple bug fixes.
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Two simple bug fixes.
  - From: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]