This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Tuplification of tree-ssa-uncprop.c


Actually, the index i is used in two loops and the uses are disjoint.
The first loops counts from 0 to n_lables - 1. The other loop counts
from 0 to n_basic_blocks - 1.  Instead of using a cast, I just use two
indices l (size_t) and i (int).  A cast would look like an ugly hack.
I will re-test and commit.

-Doug

2008/4/14 Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>:
> On 4/14/08 1:33 PM, Doug Kwan (Ãö®¶¼w) wrote:
>
> > They were of type size_t but I ran it into a warning about comparing i
> > with n_basic_blocks, which is of the type int.  The warning became a
> > compilation error with -Werror. I can put a cast in the comparison.
> >
>
>  Ah, yes, that's a good idea.
>
>
>  Thanks.  Diego.
>

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]