This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Ada] Change Raise_Exception for AI-446 (Ada 2005 compatibility)

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:24:28 +0200
Subject: Re: [Ada] Change Raise_Exception for AI-446 (Ada 2005 compatibility)
References: <20080409071939.GA2999@adacore.com>

--  Note: it would be really nice to give a pragma No_Return for this
--  procedure, but it would be wrong, since Raise_Exception does return if
--  given the null exception in Ada 95 mode. However we do special case the
--  name in the test in the compiler for issuing a warning for a missing
--  return after this call. Program_Error seems reasonable enough in such a
--  case. See also the routine Raise_Exception_Always in the private part.

Shouldn't this special casing be removed now that Raise_Exception *is* marked as No_Return?

Paolo

References:
- [Ada] Change Raise_Exception for AI-446 (Ada 2005 compatibility)
  - From: Arnaud Charlet

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]