This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix vector_size handling in templates (PR c++/35758)
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 06:09:37 -0400
- Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix vector_size handling in templates (PR c++/35758)
- References: <20080401143240.GR30807@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <47FA5AA6.7010802@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:32:22PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I believe this patch is appropriate and correct and fixes the
> regression, regardless of whether we also try to implement deduction for
> 'vector T'. If reconstruct_complex_type doesn't do the right thing for
> C++, this is the way to fix it.
Here is an updated patch, which also changes rs6000 and spu
reconstruct_complex_type calls to lang_hoos.types.reconstruct_complex_type
(__altivec__ and __spu_vector__ attributes aren't late and I don't think the
C++ FE should hardcode their names, so they have the same issues as
vector_size before it was changed into an unconditionally late attribute).
I believe this patch fixes the regression part of these problems, as
gcc 4.2.x and earlier weren't allowing these attributes on type dependent
decls. So ok for trunk/4.3?
That said, even when not regression I think the remaining issues are serious
wrong-code issues and so should be fixed even on 4.3. If the needed calls
of apply_late_template_attributes for TYPE_ATTRIBUTES are added where needed
in tsubst* (not sure exactly where, unfortunately), then a patch like
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35758#c15
could fix the non-deduction cases (e.g. when using explicit template args
etc.), both for vector_size attribute, but also for the target specific
altivec/spu_vector. The deduction for vector_size is perhaps possible,
it is just a matter of checking that the template parameter has vector_size
attribute and if it does, see whether the matching type is VECTOR_TYPE
and deduce its TREE_TYPE. But altivec/spu_vector attributes will be
much harder or impossible to deduce, given that they seem to throw away
the original type and only use TYPE_MODE to find out what vector type to
use. Furthermore, I wonder why e.g. the altivec attribute only uses the
first letter of the attribute argument, so even __attribute((altivec (bar)))
will be handled as __attribute((altivec (bool__))).
2008-04-08 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/35758
* c-common.c (handle_vector_size_attribute): Call
lang_hooks.types.reconstruct_complex_type instead of
reconstruct_complex_type.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_handle_altivec_attribute): Likewise.
* config/spu/spu.c (spu_handle_vector_attribute): Likewise.
* langhooks.h (struct lang_hooks_for_types): Add
reconstruct_complex_type hook.
* langhooks-def.h (LANG_HOOKS_RECONSTRUCT_COMPLEX_TYPE): Define.
(LANG_HOOKS_FOR_TYPES_INITIALIZER): Add it.
* cp-tree.h (cp_reconstruct_complex_type): New prototype.
* cp-objcp-common.h (LANG_HOOKS_RECONSTRUCT_COMPLEX_TYPE): Define.
* decl2.c (is_late_template_attribute): Only make vector_size
late tmpl attribute if argument is type or value dependent.
(cp_reconstruct_complex_type): New function.
* g++.dg/ext/vector14.C: New test.
--- gcc/c-common.c.jj 2008-03-31 23:54:50.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/c-common.c 2008-04-08 11:37:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -6104,7 +6104,7 @@ handle_vector_size_attribute (tree *node
new_type = build_vector_type (type, nunits);
/* Build back pointers if needed. */
- *node = reconstruct_complex_type (*node, new_type);
+ *node = lang_hooks.types.reconstruct_complex_type (*node, new_type);
return NULL_TREE;
}
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c.jj 2008-04-08 11:27:37.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c 2008-04-08 11:45:55.000000000 +0200
@@ -19743,7 +19743,7 @@ rs6000_handle_altivec_attribute (tree *n
*no_add_attrs = true; /* No need to hang on to the attribute. */
if (result)
- *node = reconstruct_complex_type (*node, result);
+ *node = lang_hooks.types.reconstruct_complex_type (*node, result);
return NULL_TREE;
}
--- gcc/config/spu/spu.c.jj 2008-04-08 11:46:09.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/config/spu/spu.c 2008-04-08 11:47:13.000000000 +0200
@@ -3022,7 +3022,7 @@ spu_handle_vector_attribute (tree * node
if (!result)
warning (0, "`%s' attribute ignored", IDENTIFIER_POINTER (name));
else
- *node = reconstruct_complex_type (*node, result);
+ *node = lang_hooks.types.reconstruct_complex_type (*node, result);
return NULL_TREE;
}
--- gcc/langhooks.h.jj 2008-04-07 10:42:57.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/langhooks.h 2008-04-08 11:37:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@ struct lang_hooks_for_types
for the debugger about the array bounds, strides, etc. */
bool (*get_array_descr_info) (const_tree, struct array_descr_info *);
+ /* If we requested a pointer to a vector, build up the pointers that
+ we stripped off while looking for the inner type. Similarly for
+ return values from functions. The argument TYPE is the top of the
+ chain, and BOTTOM is the new type which we will point to. */
+ tree (*reconstruct_complex_type) (tree, tree);
+
/* Nonzero if types that are identical are to be hashed so that only
one copy is kept. If a language requires unique types for each
user-specified type, such as Ada, this should be set to TRUE. */
--- gcc/langhooks-def.h.jj 2008-04-07 10:42:57.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/langhooks-def.h 2008-04-08 11:37:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ extern tree lhd_make_node (enum tree_cod
lhd_omp_firstprivatize_type_sizes
#define LANG_HOOKS_TYPE_HASH_EQ NULL
#define LANG_HOOKS_GET_ARRAY_DESCR_INFO NULL
+#define LANG_HOOKS_RECONSTRUCT_COMPLEX_TYPE reconstruct_complex_type
#define LANG_HOOKS_HASH_TYPES true
#define LANG_HOOKS_FOR_TYPES_INITIALIZER { \
@@ -182,6 +183,7 @@ extern tree lhd_make_node (enum tree_cod
LANG_HOOKS_OMP_FIRSTPRIVATIZE_TYPE_SIZES, \
LANG_HOOKS_TYPE_HASH_EQ, \
LANG_HOOKS_GET_ARRAY_DESCR_INFO, \
+ LANG_HOOKS_RECONSTRUCT_COMPLEX_TYPE, \
LANG_HOOKS_HASH_TYPES \
}
--- gcc/cp/cp-tree.h.jj 2008-04-07 10:42:55.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/cp-tree.h 2008-04-08 11:37:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -4282,6 +4282,7 @@ extern tree grokfield (const cp_declarat
tree, bool, tree, tree);
extern tree grokbitfield (const cp_declarator *, cp_decl_specifier_seq *,
tree);
+extern tree cp_reconstruct_complex_type (tree, tree);
extern void cplus_decl_attributes (tree *, tree, int);
extern void finish_anon_union (tree);
extern void cp_write_global_declarations (void);
--- gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.h.jj 2008-04-07 10:42:55.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.h 2008-04-08 11:37:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ extern tree objcp_tsubst_copy_and_build
#define LANG_HOOKS_TYPE_PROMOTES_TO cxx_type_promotes_to
#undef LANG_HOOKS_REGISTER_BUILTIN_TYPE
#define LANG_HOOKS_REGISTER_BUILTIN_TYPE c_register_builtin_type
+#undef LANG_HOOKS_RECONSTRUCT_COMPLEX_TYPE
+#define LANG_HOOKS_RECONSTRUCT_COMPLEX_TYPE cp_reconstruct_complex_type
#undef LANG_HOOKS_TO_TARGET_CHARSET
#define LANG_HOOKS_TO_TARGET_CHARSET c_common_to_target_charset
#undef LANG_HOOKS_GIMPLIFY_EXPR
--- gcc/cp/decl2.c.jj 2008-03-25 23:31:25.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/decl2.c 2008-04-08 11:37:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -991,11 +991,8 @@ is_late_template_attribute (tree attr, t
/* Unknown attribute. */
return false;
- /* Attribute vector_size handling wants to dive into the back end array
- building code, which breaks during template processing. */
- if (is_attribute_p ("vector_size", name)
- /* Attribute weak handling wants to write out assembly right away. */
- || is_attribute_p ("weak", name))
+ /* Attribute weak handling wants to write out assembly right away. */
+ if (is_attribute_p ("weak", name))
return true;
/* If any of the arguments are dependent expressions, we can't evaluate
@@ -1120,6 +1117,62 @@ save_template_attributes (tree *attr_p,
}
}
+/* Like reconstruct_complex_type, but handle also template trees. */
+
+tree
+cp_reconstruct_complex_type (tree type, tree bottom)
+{
+ tree inner, outer;
+
+ if (TREE_CODE (type) == POINTER_TYPE)
+ {
+ inner = cp_reconstruct_complex_type (TREE_TYPE (type), bottom);
+ outer = build_pointer_type_for_mode (inner, TYPE_MODE (type),
+ TYPE_REF_CAN_ALIAS_ALL (type));
+ }
+ else if (TREE_CODE (type) == REFERENCE_TYPE)
+ {
+ inner = cp_reconstruct_complex_type (TREE_TYPE (type), bottom);
+ outer = build_reference_type_for_mode (inner, TYPE_MODE (type),
+ TYPE_REF_CAN_ALIAS_ALL (type));
+ }
+ else if (TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE)
+ {
+ inner = cp_reconstruct_complex_type (TREE_TYPE (type), bottom);
+ outer = build_cplus_array_type (inner, TYPE_DOMAIN (type));
+ /* Don't call cp_build_qualified_type on ARRAY_TYPEs, the
+ element type qualification will be handled by the recursive
+ cp_reconstruct_complex_type call and cp_build_qualified_type
+ for ARRAY_TYPEs changes the element type. */
+ return outer;
+ }
+ else if (TREE_CODE (type) == FUNCTION_TYPE)
+ {
+ inner = cp_reconstruct_complex_type (TREE_TYPE (type), bottom);
+ outer = build_function_type (inner, TYPE_ARG_TYPES (type));
+ }
+ else if (TREE_CODE (type) == METHOD_TYPE)
+ {
+ inner = cp_reconstruct_complex_type (TREE_TYPE (type), bottom);
+ /* The build_method_type_directly() routine prepends 'this' to argument list,
+ so we must compensate by getting rid of it. */
+ outer
+ = build_method_type_directly
+ (TREE_TYPE (TREE_VALUE (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (type))),
+ inner,
+ TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (type)));
+ }
+ else if (TREE_CODE (type) == OFFSET_TYPE)
+ {
+ inner = cp_reconstruct_complex_type (TREE_TYPE (type), bottom);
+ outer = build_offset_type (TYPE_OFFSET_BASETYPE (type), inner);
+ }
+ else
+ return bottom;
+
+ return cp_build_qualified_type (outer, TYPE_QUALS (type));
+}
+
/* Like decl_attributes, but handle C++ complexity. */
void
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/vector14.C.jj 2008-04-08 11:37:36.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/vector14.C 2008-04-08 11:37:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// PR c++/35758
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+#define vector __attribute__((vector_size(16)))
+
+template<int N> vector signed int foo (vector float value) {}
+
+template<int> void foo (float) {}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+ vector float v;
+ float f;
+ foo<1> (v);
+ foo<1> (f);
+}
Jakub