This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Converting tree-tailcall.c to use GIMPLE.

From: "=?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=" <dougkwan at google dot com>
To: "Zdenek Dvorak" <rakdver at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Cc: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:58:46 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Converting tree-tailcall.c to use GIMPLE.
References: <498552560804031821s91ac9ffjb82dccda102c11e5@mail.gmail.com> <20080404023238.GA9535@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <498552560804032152w7bc830e1r528f9a047c4e2082@mail.gmail.com> <20080404045702.GA9367@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

Thanks for clarifying this and reviewing this patch.  I thought
garbage collection could happen during a pass.  I will remove the GTY
markers and the related changes.

-Doug

2008/4/3 Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@kam.mff.cuni.cz>:
> Hi,
>
>
>  > What if a gabage collection happens in the middle of the pass ?
>
>  it will not (garbage collection in gcc is run only between the passes).
>  Thus, adding gc roots for things that do not live across several passes
>  is useless (and may cause memory leaks),
>
>  Zdenek
>

References:
- [PATCH][TUPLES] Converting tree-tailcall.c to use GIMPLE.
  - From: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=
- Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Converting tree-tailcall.c to use GIMPLE.
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Converting tree-tailcall.c to use GIMPLE.
  - From: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=
- Re: [PATCH][TUPLES] Converting tree-tailcall.c to use GIMPLE.
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]