This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: struct function cleanup part I
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > But I can go for cfun->rtl, or perhaps, I would preffer rtl(cfun) since
> > then we can avoid the indirection.
>
[...]
>
> I completely understand the wish for poor-mans OO in GCC, and I agree with
> many other places that do that.
Poor-mans OO in C with a 80 column formatting restriction. It's not that our
function names are short - with tuples and without function overloading we're
adding pre- and post-fixes everywhere.
Stop the (useless) character inflation!
:)
Ok, at least half-way serious!
Richard.