This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] The Integrated Register Allocator

From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>
To: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>, Steven Bosscher <steven dot bosscher at gmail dot com>, Kenneth dot Zadeck at naturalbridge dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:29:49 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFA] The Integrated Register Allocator
References: <87d8b5c30804021449h6732277fr1472bc3f74ce9e93@mail.gmail.com> <47F4ED6B.70706@redhat.com> <20080403150202.GA24622@caradoc.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:44:59AM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
* The print-rtl.c bits, what are they for?  This isn't clear to me,
from the patch...
This very small change introduced the flag for more compact RTL
listings.  It makes RTL more readable (to see more RTL insn on on the
screen although skipping some RTL info).
But if it is convenient for me. That does not mean that it will be convenient for others. I can remove it.
This sounds useful; perhaps you could post it separately?  That will
help reduce the size of the IRA patch (a little bit).

Ok, I'll keep it in mind and will send it when I am not too busy.

References:
- Re: [RFA] The Integrated Register Allocator
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [RFA] The Integrated Register Allocator
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: [RFA] The Integrated Register Allocator
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]