This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++/Obj-C++ PATCH] Fix Objective-C++ breakage
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Doug Gregor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Richard Guenther
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:10 PM, NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/26/08, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Doug Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > My SFINAE patch to the C++ front end broke the Objective-C++ front
> > > > > > end. This patch fixes the problem, which involves some renaming of
> > > > > > routines in the C++ front end as well as minor fixes to the
> > > > > > Objective-C++ front end. Okay for mainline?
> > > > >
> > > > > This is the third bootstrap failure for Objective-C++ in less than two
> > > > > weeks. I think it is either time to require Objective-C++ building or
> > > > > decide we should remove it.
> > > >
> > > > I agree. It is too tightly coupled to common C/C++ code to be not
> > > > enabled by default if it stays in. But you can add a +1 for the voting count
> > > > for removing the ObjC++ frontend.
> > >
> > > Why do you want to remove the frontend?
> >
> > Because it is basically unmaintained.
>
> Which means I don't even know whether I can commit this patch to *fix*
> the front end or not. I'll give it 24 more hours, and commit if I
> don't hear any screams.
> - Doug
Actually we do have a maintainer, Stan would you please take a look?
Thanks,
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu