This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: PATCH: x86: Check BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT for alignment
- From: Danny Smith <dannysmith at clear dot net dot nz>
- To: "'H.J. Lu'" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, 'Uros Bizjak' <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- Cc: 'GCC Patches' <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:46:41 +1300
- Subject: RE: PATCH: x86: Check BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT for alignment
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Uros Bizjak
> <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > > 2008-03-25 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
> > >
> > > * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_arg_boundary): Check
> > > BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT instead of 128.
> > > (setup_incoming_varargs_64): Likewise.
> > >
> >
> > -ENOTESTINGINFO?
> >
> > Please also remove redefinition of the default value in cygming.h,
> > around line 330.
> >
> > OK for mainline with this change, but please wait 24h for possible
> > comments from cygming maintainer (CC'd), and perhaps for
> Darwin people
> > (CC'd) if they want to test the patch in advance.
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is the patch with cygming.h change. I will wait 24 hours
> before checking
> it in.
This is OK for cygming.
Thanks
Danny