This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] utf-16 and utf-32 support in C and C++

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Paul Koning" <Paul_Koning at dell dot com>
Cc: kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:58:37 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] utf-16 and utf-32 support in C and C++
References: <20080313193208.GE19427@oracle.com> <18393.33918.108982.224973@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Paul Koning <Paul_Koning@dell.com> wrote:
> Is the u"foo" and U"foo" notation a standard?

Yes, I know it seems weird but that is what the C draft technical
report and the C++ proposal both say.

I would agree that U and UL is better but I did not make this up.

--- Pinski

References:
- [PATCH] utf-16 and utf-32 support in C and C++
  - From: Kris Van Hees
- Re: [PATCH] utf-16 and utf-32 support in C and C++
  - From: Paul Koning

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]