This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Status of the 4.1 branch (was: [4.2 PATCH]: backport solaris11 c99-math fixincludes patch)

From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
To: "Gerald Pfeifer" <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Andreas Tobler" <andreast-list at fgznet dot ch>, "GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <bkorb at gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:44:22 -0700
Subject: Re: Status of the 4.1 branch (was: [4.2 PATCH]: backport solaris11 c99-math fixincludes patch)
References: <47C50AB2.7000002@fgznet.ch> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0802270923001.9101@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <47C5B89F.5000403@fgznet.ch> <84fc9c000802271437x4809fd39p77a9bc1292a9dc61@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.1.00.0803092153000.22304@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

From: "Gerald Pfeifer" <gerald@pfeifer.com>

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Richard Guenther wrote:

The 4.1 branch is in deep maintainance mode and should receive only
serious wrong-code bug fixes and fixes for regressions on the branch
itself. It also won't get any more releases due to GPL transition
issues.


Could you add a note to our main page regarding this, or shall we just
leave the latest status there where, after the work on the 4.3.0 release,
the 4.1-branch isn't actually present any longer?

Is it time to close the 4.1 branch? We have four active branches at the moment, which is probably too many.

       --Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Status of the 4.1 branch
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

References:
- Status of the 4.1 branch (was: [4.2 PATCH]: backport solaris11 c99-math fixincludes patch)
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]